Content
88%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A lean, highly actionable triage workflow with explicit validation checkpoints and concrete commands. The only notable weakness is a dangling reference.md link with no corresponding bundle file.
Suggestions
Add the referenced reference.md to ./references/ (or remove the link) so the worked-examples pointer resolves.
Tighten a few explanatory sentences (e.g. the 'one red run is one sample' rationale) to lift conciseness toward 5.
Consider moving the grader-location table into reference.md to keep SKILL.md as a pure overview, improving progressive disclosure.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly efficient and operational — no conceptual padding about what evals or graders are — with a few spots ('Scenarios run a live model concurrently, so one red run is one sample') that could be trimmed further. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides copy-paste-ready commands (pnpm --filter @novu/agent-evals exec vitest run ...), a location table mapping each layer to a file, and concrete RunResult fields to inspect — fully executable guidance covering the common triage cases. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear top-down sequence (Rule 0 → Step 4) with explicit validation checkpoints (re-run 3–5×, confirm fix across re-runs, run synthetic unit tests) and a feedback loop, fully meeting the destructive/batch validation requirement. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized into clear sections with a single clearly-signaled one-level reference to reference.md; the gap is that reference.md is referenced but not present in any bundle directory, a minor navigation flaw. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |