Content
81%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, highly actionable workflow with clear sequencing, approval gates, and a validation/feedback quality gate, backed by a real one-level-deep reference file. Its main weakness is conciseness: key requirements are restated across multiple sections and some standard SEO basics are over-explained.
Suggestions
State the ≥1000-word and ≥3-inline-image requirements once in the deliverables and reference them from the editorial bar, plan, and quality gate instead of repeating each rule verbatim.
Trim standard SEO placement guidance (keyword in title/H1/first-100-words) to a one-line pointer to the guidelines reference, since it restates knowledge Claude already has.
Consider moving the full output-format template and the image-generation fallback detail into references/content-writing.md to keep SKILL.md a leaner overview.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly actionable but repeats the same requirements across sections — the ≥1000-word and ≥3-inline-image rules appear in the editorial bar, the Step 4 plan, the Step 5 deliverables, and the Step 6 quality gate — and restates standard SEO placement rules Claude already knows; could be tightened by stating each rule once and referencing it. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Highly actionable: a concrete outline template, per-content-type deliverable lists, an executable bash snippet to locate the reference, an ordered image-generation fallback chain, a copy-paste output-format block, and a hard-requirement quality-gate checklist. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear six-step sequence (Determine Job → Gather Context → Read Guidelines → Research & Plan → Write → Quality Gate) with explicit approval checkpoints ("Present outline for approval before writing", "Get approval before rewriting") and a validation feedback loop ("Fix failures before presenting"). | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Good structure with a real, clearly signaled one-level-deep reference (references/content-writing.md, verified to exist) holding the detailed writing guidelines while SKILL.md carries the workflow; minor gap in that the full output-format template and image-generation detail are inlined in the body rather than referenced. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |