Content
86%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A concise, well-organized instruction-only skill with a clear diagnostic-to-approval workflow and embedded validation guardrails. The main improvement lever is making the executable guidance slightly more concrete.
Suggestions
Add a short concrete example of a proposed mutation (scope, current value, proposed value, rationale) so the 'present each exact mutation' instruction is unambiguous and copy-paste ready.
Specify the threshold-setting rule more concretely (e.g., a minimum spend/conversions floor or a stat-sig heuristic) so 'Set a threshold appropriate to the named target CPA' is directly actionable.
Name the actual observation-window convention to use (e.g., conversion lag + N days) so 'Revisit after the declared observation window' has an explicit default.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean and efficient body that assumes Claude's competence; no padding or explanation of concepts Claude already knows, and every line earns its place. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides concrete, specific guidance (bottleneck classification list, ranked reversible-move order, required mutation fields), but as an instruction-only skill it lacks copy-paste executable code or commands, leaving minor gaps. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear sequence of diagnose -> rank -> approval/follow-up with validation checkpoints ('Verify the conversion signal', 'Do not declare a loser from a few clicks', 'read back the result'), with only minor validation gaps relative to the explicit feedback-loop ideal. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | A short (under 50 lines), single-purpose skill with no external bundle files and well-organized sections, satisfying the simple-skill exception for a top score. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |