Content
86%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is concise, well-structured, and actionable with a clear sequenced workflow; it loses only minor points for relying on directory hints rather than exact commands and for implicit rather than explicit error-recovery loops.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean and efficient; assumes Claude's competence with no padding or explanation of concepts Claude already knows, and every line (steps, guardrails) earns its place. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides concrete, actionable guidance with specific paths (summary.json, hooks/subagent-stop-gate.sh, usage log) and clear decision rules; minor gap is the absence of literal commands or code for locating the newest run beyond a directory hint. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Five clearly sequenced steps with explicit checks (roster validity, quorum, dissent, gate usage log) and a recommendation mapping; this is an interpretive/non-destructive skill so the destructive-operation cap does not apply, but explicit validation/error-recovery feedback loops are only implied rather than stated. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized sections (When to use, Steps, Guardrails) under 50 lines with no external bundle files needed; for a self-contained simple skill this is appropriately structured and easy to navigate. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |