Content
72%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is concise, well-organized, and appropriately scoped, with clear step sequencing. It is held back only by described-rather-than-shown invocations and the absence of a dispatch-time error-recovery loop.
Suggestions
Show the actual invocation commands (e.g. the check-providers.sh call and the /octo:debate dispatch template) rather than only describing them, to make guidance copy-paste ready.
Add an explicit validate→fix→retry loop for the dispatch step (e.g. on seat failure or motion rejection, re-seat and re-dispatch) to lift workflow_clarity.
Keep the current lean structure; no splitting into separate reference files is needed at this size.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean and efficient with no padding or over-explanation of concepts Claude knows; every line earns its place, matching the 'lean and efficient' anchor. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Names a concrete script path and a specific slash command, but invocation is described rather than templated and no runnable command is shown, matching the 'some concrete guidance but incomplete' anchor. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear 5-step sequence with a seat-availability checkpoint exists, but the dispatch of paid external seats has no validate→fix→retry feedback loop, matching the 'steps listed but validation gaps' anchor. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | A single-purpose skill under 50 lines with well-organized sections and a one-level reference to a real helper script; per simple_skills notes this scores 3. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |