Content
63%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a strongly sequenced, largely executable workflow: five enforced steps, concrete shell commands, a validation gate, and per-step error handling — the coercive framing is repetitive but the underlying instructions are real and runnable. Its main defects are token-wasteful duplication of the same prohibition, a banner template with a duplicated provider line, a placeholder-laden task snippet, and two references to files that are absent from the bundle, which leaves a reader directed to documentation that does not exist.
Suggestions
State the no-fallback rule once (e.g., in the HARD-GATE block) and have Steps 3-4 and the Error Handling section reference it instead of restating it — this alone would remove roughly a dozen redundant lines.
Fix the banner template's duplicate Antigravity entry (two lines with different emoji both rendering ${agy_status}) and drop the hardcoded cost/time estimates or mark them as illustrative.
Resolve the dangling references: either ship 'skills/blocks/codex-host-adapter.md' and 'skill-security-framing.md' in the bundle, or inline their essential guidance (e.g., the URL-validation rules) so no step points at a missing file.
Replace the TaskCreate/TaskUpdate 'taskId: "..."' placeholders with concrete guidance on capturing the returned task ID, making that section copy-paste executable like the rest.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly dense, actionable instruction rather than explanation of known concepts, but the same enforcement constraint ('do NOT research directly / do not substitute') is repeated four times — in the HARD-GATE block, the Step 3 prohibition list, Step 4, and the Error Handling section — and the banner template duplicates the Antigravity line twice ('🟡 Antigravity CLI' and '🧭 Antigravity CLI' both rendering ${agy_status}). It is above the verbose/padded 2-anchor but clearly could be tightened to earn 4. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Guidance is largely executable: complete bash snippets for provider detection, the orchestrate.sh invocation with concrete flags, a ready-to-use AskUserQuestion payload, and a runnable validation script. It falls short of 5 because the TaskCreate/TaskUpdate snippet leaves 'taskId: "..."' as placeholders, and no example shows how the ${depth_choice} placeholders in the banner are populated versus displayed. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Five mandatory steps are explicitly sequenced with a hard ordering ('DO NOT PROCEED TO STEP 2 until...'), an explicit validation gate in Step 4, and a per-step error-handling section. Not 5 because the validation is a fragile post-hoc check (find -mmin -10 on a results directory) with no validate→fix→retry loop for orchestrate.sh failures, and the banner template contains a copy-paste error (the duplicate Antigravity line). | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Section structure is clear and the operational core is appropriately inlined, but both file references are dangling: 'skills/blocks/codex-host-adapter.md' and 'skill-security-framing.md' do not exist in the bundle (no references/, scripts/, or assets/ directories are present). This matches the 3-anchor (structure present, references present but not backed by an organized bundle) rather than 4, which requires well-signaled references that actually resolve. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 14 / 20 Passed |