Content
88%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is highly actionable and well-sequenced with explicit validation checkpoints and feedback loops, and it avoids concept-padding. Minor room to tighten a few inlined blocks or move the large clarification example into a reference file.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly efficient with concrete command/code and no generic concept padding; the detailed sandbox-allowlist paragraph is earned operational guidance rather than fluff, though a few inlined blocks could be trimmed. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides a copy-paste bash invocation, a complete AskUserQuestion code block, explicit flag translations, and concrete quorum/gate rules covering the common cases. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear phased sequence (Phase 0A through Implementation Gates) with explicit validation checkpoints (quorum checks, budget re-checks before each phase) and feedback loops (retry on chair failure, stop on lost quorum). | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized into clear sections with a single SKILL.md and no bundle files; minor gaps since the large clarification code block and sandbox details could be split into references, though no bundle directory exists. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |