Content
81%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured instruction skill with a clear sequenced workflow, explicit validation/checkpoint rules, and concrete commands. The main weakness is a dangling script reference and a few trimmable rationale sentences.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and does not re-explain concepts Claude already knows; a few short rationale sentences ('An unverified bug report is a hypothesis...') could be trimmed but most tokens earn their place, fitting anchor 4 rather than the fully stripped anchor 5. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides concrete executable commands (gh issue list, bd ready, gh issue edit --add-label) and one complete bash snippet for the comment gate, with specific state definitions; it is mostly executable with minor gaps around the categorise/verify steps, matching anchor 4. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear five-step sequence (Categorise, Verify, Assign state, Write brief, Record) is paired with an explicit Verify step, a Stop/Checkpoint Rules section, and a final Verification checklist, satisfying anchor 5's explicit validation and feedback loops for destructive/batch moves like closing. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | A single, well-sectioned file with clear headers and one-level cross-references to sibling skills; the inlined reference to scripts/safe-gh-comment.sh is a dangling path (no bundle dir exists), a minor organization gap that keeps it at anchor 4 rather than 5. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |