CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

skill-thought-partner

Brainstorm creatively with pattern spotting and paradox hunting — use for ideation and exploration

64

Quality

76%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./.claude/skills/skill-thought-partner/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

77%Weight 40%Scale 1-3

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body is highly actionable with a clear sequenced workflow and recovery loops, but it is verbose and monolithic. Splitting the large export template and technique detail into referenced files would improve both conciseness and progressive disclosure.

Suggestions

Move the full Phase 4 session-export template into a referenced file (e.g., EXPORT_FORMAT.md) and keep only a brief pointer inline, reducing token load.

Remove the ASCII flowchart since it restates the phase-by-phase structure already laid out in the section headers below it.

Consider extracting each technique's detailed example prompts into a techniques reference file, keeping the SKILL.md overview lean.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The ~430-line body is skill-specific and avoids explaining known concepts, but it is verbose: the ASCII flowchart duplicates the phase structure detailed below, and several example lists and tables could be tightened.

2 / 3

Actionability

It provides concrete, copy-paste-ready guidance: a verbatim session-start script, specific example prompts per technique, an exact session-export output format, and worked dialogue examples.

3 / 3

Workflow Clarity

The four phases are clearly sequenced with explicit validation signals ("Signs you've found a pattern/paradox") and feedback loops for error recovery (flat conversation, stuck user, redirects).

3 / 3

Progressive Disclosure

Sections are well-organized, but the skill is a large monolithic SKILL.md over 50 lines with no external references; substantial inline content (the long output template, detailed technique breakdowns) could be split into reference files.

2 / 3

Total

10

/

12

Passed

Description

75%Weight 40%Scale 1-3

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description is well-structured with explicit what/when guidance and a distinctive niche, but it under-represents the skill's full action set and omits several natural trigger phrasings. Tightening keyword coverage would lift the weaker dimensions.

Suggestions

Mention all four breakthrough techniques (add Naming the Unnamed and Contrast Creation) so the capability list is comprehensive rather than partial.

Add common natural trigger phrasings like "think through this with me", "explore ideas", or "fresh perspective" alongside "ideation".

Consider replacing the slightly formal "ideation" with more conversational terms a user would naturally say.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

It names the ideation domain and concrete actions ("pattern spotting and paradox hunting"), but only surfaces 2 of the 4 techniques described in the body, so it is not comprehensive.

2 / 3

Completeness

It clearly answers both what ("Brainstorm creatively with pattern spotting and paradox hunting") and when via an explicit "use for ideation and exploration" trigger clause.

3 / 3

Trigger Term Quality

It includes relevant natural keywords ("Brainstorm", "ideation", "exploration") but misses common variations users actually say, such as "think through", "explore ideas", or "fresh perspective" that the trigger block lists.

2 / 3

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

It carves a clear creative-ideation niche with distinctive technique triggers unlikely to fire for research, planning, or decision skills.

3 / 3

Total

10

/

12

Passed

Validation

93%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

frontmatter_unknown_keys

Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata

Warning

Total

15

/

16

Passed

Repository
nyldn/claude-octopus
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.