github.com/obra/superpowers
Skill | Added | Review |
|---|---|---|
using-git-worktrees Use when starting feature work that needs isolation from current workspace or before executing implementation plans - ensures an isolated workspace exists via native tools or git worktree fallback | 69 69 Impact — No eval scenarios have been run Securityby Passed No known issues Reviewed: Version: d884ae0 | |
test-driven-development Use when implementing any feature or bugfix, before writing implementation code | 53 53 Impact — No eval scenarios have been run Securityby Passed No known issues Reviewed: Version: d884ae0 | |
requesting-code-review Use when completing tasks, implementing major features, or before merging to verify work meets requirements | 56 56 Impact — No eval scenarios have been run Securityby Passed No known issues Reviewed: Version: d884ae0 | |
writing-skills Use when creating new skills, editing existing skills, or verifying skills work before deployment | 66 66 Impact — No eval scenarios have been run Securityby Passed No known issues Reviewed: Version: d884ae0 | |
writing-plans Use when you have a spec or requirements for a multi-step task, before touching code | 48 48 Impact — No eval scenarios have been run Securityby Passed No known issues Reviewed: Version: d884ae0 | |
verification-before-completion Use when about to claim work is complete, fixed, or passing, before committing or creating PRs - requires running verification commands and confirming output before making any success claims; evidence before assertions always | 91 91 1.22x Agent success vs baseline Impact 92% 1.22xAverage score across 3 eval scenarios Securityby Passed No known issues Reviewed: Version: d884ae0 | |
using-superpowers Use when starting any conversation - establishes how to find and use skills, requiring skill invocation before ANY response including clarifying questions | 62 62 Impact — No eval scenarios have been run Securityby Passed No known issues Reviewed: Version: d884ae0 | |
systematic-debugging Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes | 52 52 Impact — No eval scenarios have been run Securityby Passed No known issues Reviewed: Version: d884ae0 | |
subagent-driven-development Use when executing implementation plans with independent tasks in the current session | 58 58 Impact — No eval scenarios have been run Securityby Passed No known issues Reviewed: Version: d884ae0 | |
receiving-code-review Use when receiving code review feedback, before implementing suggestions, especially if feedback seems unclear or technically questionable - requires technical rigor and verification, not performative agreement or blind implementation | 75 75 Impact — No eval scenarios have been run Securityby Advisory Suggest reviewing before use Reviewed: Version: d884ae0 | |
finishing-a-development-branch Use when implementation is complete, all tests pass, and you need to decide how to integrate the work - guides completion of development work by presenting structured options for merge, PR, or cleanup | 67 67 Impact — No eval scenarios have been run Securityby Passed No known issues Reviewed: Version: d884ae0 | |
executing-plans Use when you have a written implementation plan to execute in a separate session with review checkpoints | 56 56 Impact — No eval scenarios have been run Securityby Passed No known issues Reviewed: Version: d884ae0 | |
dispatching-parallel-agents Use when facing 2+ independent tasks that can be worked on without shared state or sequential dependencies | 60 60 Impact — No eval scenarios have been run Securityby Passed No known issues Reviewed: Version: d884ae0 | |
brainstorming You MUST use this before any creative work - creating features, building components, adding functionality, or modifying behavior. Explores user intent, requirements and design before implementation. | 74 74 1.05x Agent success vs baseline Impact 60% 1.05xAverage score across 3 eval scenarios Securityby Passed No known issues Reviewed: Version: d884ae0 |