Content
85%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a well-structured, highly actionable audit workflow with clear sequencing and a concrete output template. Its only real weakness is mild redundancy between the opening paragraph, the workflow steps, and the Rules section.
Suggestions
Remove the verbatim restate of the frontmatter description in the opening paragraph, or trim it to a single orienting sentence.
Consolidate the Rules section so it only adds net-new guidance (e.g. arXiv-ID checks, time-bounding) rather than restating steps already covered in the Workflow.
Consider moving the full report markdown template into a reference file and summarizing the structure inline, to keep the main body focused on the audit procedure.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly efficient and free of basic-concept padding, but the opening paragraph restates the frontmatter description verbatim and the Rules section reiterates workflow steps (e.g. Rule 1 restates Step 3's "check every URL"), so it could be tightened. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides concrete, executable guidance throughout: explicit PASS/BROKEN/MISMATCH/UNVERIFIABLE categories, named fabrication patterns, a brand-DNA cross-reference checklist, and a copy-paste markdown report template. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The six-step workflow is clearly sequenced with verification built into each step (URL fetch, source web-search, brand-DNA cross-check); the verification categorization acts as explicit checkpoints, and fixing is deliberately out of scope so a fix-retry loop is not applicable. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files exist and none are needed; the single SKILL.md is well-organized into clear sections (When To Use, Workflow, Output Format, Rules, What This Skill Does NOT Do) with no nested or multi-level references. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |