Content
85%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a well-structured, highly actionable research playbook with concrete query templates, scoring criteria, and a complete output schema. Its main weakness is mild verbosity in the output template and framing that could be trimmed without losing clarity.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly efficient, assumes Claude's competence (it never explains what Reddit or a subreddit is), but the long output template and some repeated framing could be tightened, so it sits below the lean level 3. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides concrete, copy-paste-ready guidance — `site:reddit.com [pain point]` query templates, an explicit five-factor scoring rubric, labeled opportunity tiers, and a full output table schema — matching fully executable instruction. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | A clearly sequenced five-step process with a precondition check ('If brand_dna.md does not exist, tell the user to run research-brand first') and a 'No fake certainty' confidence checkpoint; not a destructive/batch operation so no validate-retry loop is required. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Self-contained skill with no bundle files, organized into clear sections (Inputs, Goal, Research Rules, Process, Output, What Good Output Looks Like, Final Guidance), which satisfies the simple-skill allowance for a 3. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |