Content
67%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body delivers an actionable, well-sequenced multi-stage workflow with concrete commands, named tools, validation checkpoints, and an acceptance checklist. Its main weakness is redundancy between the stage-4 template, the 输出契约 section, and the 验收 section, which inflates token cost without adding guidance.
Suggestions
Consolidate the stage-4 proposal output block and the '输出契约' section into a single source of truth for the required fields, replacing the duplicate field list with a pointer to the template.
De-duplicate the '验证' acceptance checklist against the stage-3 validation steps, or explicitly cross-reference them so the two do not restate the same criteria.
Flesh out the stage-3 review feedback loop as an explicit 'if REJECT/修改建议 → revise patch → re-run pre-check → re-submit' iteration so error recovery is unambiguous.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is dense and operational with no basic-concept padding, but the '输出契约' section restates stage 4's proposal-template fields and the '验证' section overlaps earlier workflow content, so it could be meaningfully tightened; it is not merely minor trimming. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides concrete commands (Get-Content .../inbox.jsonl, quality_report.py --strict, validate_repo.py --strict, dsh-config-sync --check, queue_cli_request/request_result, git diff --check), named analysis tools, and a copy-pasteable proposal template, with only minor argument gaps keeping it from fully executable. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Five stages are clearly sequenced (stage 1 split into 1.1–1.7) with explicit validation in stage 3 (静态预检, 前沿模型评审, 成本自检), a 5-item 验收 checklist, and a status flow new→processing→applied|rejected; the REJECT→fix recovery loop is implied rather than fully iterated, a minor validation gap. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files exist, so the skill is a single well-sectioned document (核心规则/适用范围/工作流程 阶段1-5/输出契约/验证) with no nested references; the detailed proposal template and root-cause table could theoretically live in separate files but the organization is clean, leaving only minor gaps. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 15 / 20 Passed |