Content
77%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-sequenced methodology skill with strong validation checkpoints and feedback loops, plus concrete decision tables and an output-contract template. Its main weaknesses are mild restatement redundancy across the flow, core-principles, and output-contract sections, and a broken `examples/` reference that weakens progressive disclosure.
Suggestions
Remove the restated content in '核心原则' / '输出契约' that duplicates the nine-step flow, or explicitly frame them as a one-line checklist pointing back to the steps to cut token redundancy.
Fix the `examples/` reference: either create the `examples/` directory with at least one worked example, or remove the dangling reference and inline a brief worked case so the method's application is concrete.
Signal the `examples/` reference as a clear one-level-deep markdown link (e.g., 'See [examples/](examples/)') only once the directory exists, so navigation is unambiguous.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Body is dense and assumes Claude's competence, but the '核心原则' section (lines 119-126) and the '输出契约' largely restate the nine-step flow, which could be trimmed. Not 3 because there is no concept-padding (no 'X is a common format that…') and the prose is otherwise lean; not 5 because the repeated restating is a removable redundancy. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete, executable guidance for a methodology skill — decision tables (root-cause types, constraint layers), explicit judgment questions ('对每个问题问约束存在吗…'), observable artifacts ('文件 hash / 配置生效 / 版本号'), and a copy-paste output-contract template. Not 5 because worked examples covering common cases are deferred to an external `examples/` path rather than shown inline. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Nine steps (第0步–第9步) are clearly sequenced with explicit validation checkpoints (第8步 三件套: 物证→加载→行为观察) and an explicit error-recovery feedback loop (第9步: '若未改进，回到第2步重新找根因') plus a decision gate (第6步). | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body has clear section headers and logical flow, but the sole external reference — '相关示例见 examples/' — is a bare backtick path (not a clearly signaled link) pointing to a directory that does not exist; no bundle files are present. Not 4 because the missing/buried reference breaks navigation; not 2 because the inline structure is reasonably organized. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |