CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

weekly-work-summary

按中国上海时间和中国实际工作日,从 C:\Desktop\日报 的三人日报生成固定四列表格,并覆盖保存到 C:\Desktop\共享;用于本周工作汇总、三人日报汇总和工作总结 Excel。

66

Quality

80%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./skills/weekly-work-summary/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

81%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

A tight, disciplined fixed-contract skill with a clear sequenced workflow and strong validation/feedback loops for its destructive overwrite operation. Its main gaps are a placeholder path in the example command and inline-heavy (though appropriately sized) operational detail.

Suggestions

Resolve the `<spreadsheets-skill>` placeholder into a concrete path or a clearly named variable so the PowerShell snippet is copy-paste ready.

If the fixed contract grows, consider moving the person/file mapping and 2026 holiday-calendar reference into a separate reference file to keep SKILL.md as a lean overview.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is lean and operational — fixed contracts, numbered execution steps, and failure reporting with no concept padding — assuming Claude's competence; the boundary section is slightly elaborable but not verbose enough to drop to 3.

4 / 5

Actionability

Provides concrete, mostly executable guidance — `codex_app__load_workspace_dependencies`, the node_modules Junction, the named script path, and the `--week-start` argument — with a minor gap in the `<spreadsheets-skill>` placeholder path.

4 / 5

Workflow Clarity

A clear numbered sequence with explicit validation checkpoints and feedback loops for a destructive overwrite (pre-write directory/path/exclusive-occupancy checks, post-export read-back, formula-error and render verification, "任一检查失败即失败关闭").

5 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

Well-organized sections (适用范围, 固定契约, 固定执行, 输出与失败报告) with a single well-signaled, one-level-deep reference to the verified script; the operational contract is inline, which is appropriate for a sub-50-line single-purpose skill but keeps it just short of a 5.

4 / 5

Total

17

/

20

Passed

Description

78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

A highly specific, third-person description that concretely states what the skill does and when to use it with natural Chinese trigger phrases. The distinctiveness is excellent; the main room for improvement is broader trigger-term coverage.

Suggestions

Add a couple of natural synonym trigger phrases (e.g. "周报", "三人 Excel") so users phrasing the request slightly differently still match.

Consider naming the output artifact type more explicitly (e.g. "生成 .xlsx 工作总结") to strengthen the what-and-when linkage.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Names the domain and concrete actions — "生成固定四列表格" (generate fixed four-column table) and "覆盖保存到 C:\Desktop\共享" (overwrite-save to the shared path) — with specific source/output locations; not quite the comprehensive multi-action list of a 5.

4 / 5

Completeness

Explicitly answers both what (generate fixed four-column table from three daily reports, overwrite-save) and when ("用于本周工作汇总、三人日报汇总和工作总结 Excel"); the when is concrete but could be more exhaustive in phrasing.

4 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

Includes natural trigger phrases users would say — "本周工作汇总", "三人日报汇总", "工作总结 Excel" — giving good coverage, but lacks broader synonyms or file-extension variants that would reach a 5.

4 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

An extremely specific niche — fixed three named people, Asia/Shanghai timezone, hardcoded input/output paths, fixed four-column layout — leaves minimal overlap risk with any other skill.

5 / 5

Total

17

/

20

Passed

Validation

100%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository
ooooooooooooooooooop/agent-tools
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.