Content
78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is lean, well-structured, and gives a concrete JSON output format with specific parameters and examples for both session types. Its main gap is the absence of a verification step tying generated plans back to the stated principles.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is compact and does not explain concepts Claude already knows; ritual examples like "关闭通知、播放白噪音、深呼吸3次" are concrete rather than padded. It is efficient with only minor trimmable phrasing, fitting the 4 anchor rather than 5 (a few role/framing lines could be tighter). | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | It provides a concrete, copy-paste-ready JSON output schema with fields (description, estimated_time, difficulty, type) plus specific time ranges (90-120 / 60-90 min) and ritual examples. It is mostly executable guidance with minor gaps (the [Deep Work Theme]/[Ritual] placeholders are templates), matching 4 rather than 5. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | This is a simple single-purpose skill (produce a session-plan JSON) whose single action is unambiguous, with constraints listed in 注意事项. It earns 4 rather than 5 because there is no verification that the generated sessions actually satisfy the stated principles (保护注意力, 仪式感). | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The skill is under 50 lines, has no need for external references, and is well-organized into clear sections (核心原则, 输出格式, 设计原则 with Deep Flow/Connection subsections, 注意事项). Per the simple-skill exception this qualifies for 5 with well-organized sections and no bundle files. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |