Content
85%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
Highly actionable, well-sequenced content with explicit validation checkpoints and an exemplary one-level-deep reference structure. The sole weakness is moderate redundancy from restating the same core rules in three places.
Suggestions
Consolidate the cross-stage reasoning, Phase 0, anchor immutability, and 3-strike rules into a single canonical location, and have the anti-patterns table reference them rather than restate them, to cut redundant tokens.
The top CAUTION '核心规则' box and the '触发判断' section overlap on the 'don't流程化普通任务' rule; keep one as the trigger gate and trim the other to a pointer.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Content is dense and does not explain concepts Claude already knows, but core rules (no cross-stage reasoning, no Phase 0 skip, anchor immutability, 3-strike) are restated across the top CAUTION box, the trigger/workflow sections, and the anti-patterns table, which could be tightened. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides copy-paste executable validation commands, exact CLI behavior boundaries (--project-path, --json, --help exit 0, path-component rules), and concrete checkpoint/anchor field specs with referenced templates. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Phase 0 → Elastic Execution → Completion is clearly sequenced with explicit validation gates (完备性门禁, re-grounding against Done-when, validate commands) and a 3-Strike→DEADBAND feedback loop with checklists in the anti-patterns table. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | A lean overview with a 按需加载 section and a 引用文件 table pointing one level deep to real bundle files (4 references, 3 templates, 2 scripts), all verified to exist, with clear navigation and no nesting. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |