Content
85%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A highly actionable, well-structured skill body with strong workflow sequencing, validation feedback loops, and clean progressive disclosure to verified reference files. The only notable weakness is repetition of the same value-format gotchas across multiple sections, which costs some token efficiency.
Suggestions
Consolidate the repeated value-format rules (personnel [{id:'ou_xxx'}], date milliseconds, single-select string vs multi-select array) into a single authoritative table and reference it elsewhere instead of restating in the pre-read, field-type table, forced-flow note, and scenario 2.
The pre-read checklist and the '强制流程' section overlap (both mandate calling field.list first and warn about value formats); merge them into one pre-write checklist to avoid redundancy.
Trim the repeated field-format summary that follows scenario 2, since the same formats already appear in the core field-type table above.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is dense and mostly non-obvious API knowledge (error codes, value-format gotchas, limits, concurrency rules) with no filler concept explanations, but key facts are repeated several times — the personnel format [{id:'ou_xxx'}] and date/single-select/multi-select formats reappear across the pre-read, field table, forced-flow note, and scenario 2. It is not level 3 because that repetition is unnecessary padding; not level 1 because most tokens earn their place and it assumes Claude's competence. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides concrete, copy-paste-ready JSON request examples (scenarios 1-3), an intent→tool→required-params index table, exact value formats, and error-code→root-cause→fix mappings with correct replacements. Not level 2 because the examples are executable and complete rather than pseudocode. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Sequences work via the '强制流程' (list fields → build correct format → error-code check) and backs it with explicit validation/feedback loops: the error-code table maps failures to concrete fixes, and risky batch/destructive ops carry explicit checkpoints (batch ≤500, write-conflict 1254291 → serial calls + 0.5-1s delay, delete empty rows before insert). Not level 2 because validation steps and error-recovery loops are explicit rather than implicit. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | SKILL.md is a clear overview pointing to three well-signaled, one-level-deep references (field-properties.md, record-values.md, examples.md), each annotated with a '何时查阅' trigger tied to specific error codes, and all three files exist. Not level 2 because references are clearly signaled, single-level, and content is appropriately split rather than inlined. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |