CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

feishu-bitable

飞书多维表格(Bitable)的创建、查询、编辑和管理工具。包含 27 种字段类型支持、高级筛选、批量操作和视图管理。 **当以下情况时使用此 Skill**: (1) 需要创建或管理飞书多维表格 App (2) 需要在多维表格中新增、查询、修改、删除记录(行数据) (3) 需要管理字段(列)、视图、数据表 (4) 用户提到"多维表格"、"bitable"、"数据表"、"记录"、"字段" (5) 需要批量导入数据或批量更新多维表格

68

Quality

83%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

High

Do not use without reviewing

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

Highly actionable, well-structured content that splits detail cleanly across three real reference files with explicit lookup triggers. The main weakness is conciseness: several field-value-format rules and gotchas are restated multiple times across sections, inflating the token budget without adding information.

Suggestions

Consolidate the field-type value-format rules into a single source (e.g. the table in the constraints section) and have the pre-read list and scenario examples reference it instead of restating the personnel/date/single-select formats each time.

Add an explicit validate-then-retry step for batch operations (e.g. after batch_create on >500 records, confirm pagination/split and retry on 1254291 write-conflict with the 0.5-1s delay) rather than only mentioning the limits in prose.

Trim the appendix background that recaps resource limits already implied by the tool schema (e.g. the 100/20,000/300/200 caps) unless the schema genuinely omits them.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

Mostly efficient and focused on Bitable-specific gotchas Claude wouldn't know, but the field-type format table and the personnel/date/single-select notes are repeated across the pre-read section, the constraint section, and the scenario examples, adding redundant tokens.

3 / 5

Actionability

Provides concrete, copy-paste-ready JSON request bodies with real parameters, a full intent→tool→required-params index, and executable error-code→fix mappings covering common cases.

5 / 5

Workflow Clarity

The '强制流程' (list fields → construct format → check 125406X) and error-recovery table give clear sequenced checkpoints with feedback loops; batch/delete operations however rely on hints rather than explicit validate-then-retry loop steps, leaving a minor checkpoint gap.

4 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

SKILL.md is a well-organized overview with one-level-deep, clearly signaled references (field-properties.md, record-values.md, examples.md) that are real files, each with '何时查阅' triggers and matching deep-link anchors; no nested reference chains.

5 / 5

Total

17

/

20

Passed

Description

87%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

A strong description: it states concrete capabilities in third person and provides an explicit numbered 'when to use' trigger list with natural terms. Minor specificity gaps in enumerating management actions keep it just shy of perfect on breadth.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Names the domain and several concrete actions (创建、查询、编辑、管理, 27 种字段类型, 高级筛选, 批量操作, 视图管理), though coverage of management actions is somewhat high-level rather than exhaustive.

4 / 5

Completeness

Explicitly answers 'what' (飞书多维表格创建/查询/编辑/管理工具, 27 字段类型, 高级筛选, 批量操作, 视图管理) and 'when' with a concrete numbered '当以下情况时使用此 Skill' trigger list.

5 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

Includes natural Chinese trigger phrases ("多维表格", "bitable", "数据表", "记录", "字段") users would say, plus synonyms; a few natural variations and file extensions are absent.

4 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Targets a clear niche (飞书多维表格/Bitable) with distinct triggers (多维表格, bitable, 数据表, 记录, 字段) unlikely to collide with other skills.

5 / 5

Total

18

/

20

Passed

Validation

100%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository
op7418/CodePilot
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.