Content
77%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
Highly actionable and clearly sequenced with strong error-recovery guidance, but somewhat verbose due to repeated gotchas and monolithic single-file structure that leaves no room for progressive disclosure. Splitting reference material out and consolidating duplicated guidance would lift the two middle dimensions.
Suggestions
Consolidate the four separate `completed_at` explanations (执行前必读, 核心约束 §4, 场景 3&4, 错误排查表) into one canonical section and reference it elsewhere to remove redundancy.
Move the appendix (资源关系 / 背景知识) into a REFERENCES.md file and link to it from SKILL.md, keeping the main body a lean overview that practices one-level-deep progressive disclosure.
De-duplicate the time-format guidance (stated in both 执行前必读 and the error table) into a single ISO 8601 note.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly efficient and schema-revealing, but `completed_at` is explained four times (执行前必读, 核心约束 §4, 场景 3&4, 错误排查表) and the time format is repeated, which is avoidable redundancy; not a 1 because the bulk is dense, useful gotcha knowledge rather than filler. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Copy-paste-ready JSON payloads with real parameter shapes, a concrete intent→tool→action→必填参数 table, and member-role examples give fully executable guidance. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | A pre-flight checklist (执行前必读), a quick index mapping intent to tool/required params, and an error→cause→solution recovery table provide explicit checkpoints and feedback loops; single-call operations are unambiguous. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-sectioned but ~280 lines live in one monolithic file with no bundle references; the appendix (背景知识/资源关系) and reference-style material could be split out, so it is not the lean overview-with-one-level-links of the top anchor. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |