Content
85%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a lean, well-organized, simple skill with a clear sequenced workflow and an explicit review step. Its main weakness is actionability: it names the search tool and shows the output format but does not provide a concrete, executable example call with parameters.
Suggestions
Add an executable example invocation of `tavily_web_search` showing the query argument and expected parameters so guidance is copy-paste ready.
Clarify the exact call signature or available parameters (e.g. whether max_results or search_depth can be set) rather than only stating the 5-result / 400-char constraints.
Optionally show a brief worked example (sample query -> sample Document result) to bridge the How-to-Use steps and the Result Format.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and well-sectioned with no explanation of concepts Claude already knows (no 'what is a search API' preamble); every section earns its place. Not anchor 2 because there is no padded or unnecessary explanation, and the minor description restate does not rise to that level. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | It names the tool ('Call `tavily_web_search`') and gives concrete constraints plus a real output-format example, but never shows an executable example call with its arguments. Not anchor 1 (it is concrete, not abstract) and not anchor 3 (no copy-paste-ready invocation). | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The four 'How to Use' steps are clearly sequenced and step 3 ('Review returned results for relevance and quality') is an explicit review checkpoint; for a simple, read-only search skill no heavier validation loop is required. Not anchor 2 because the sequence and review step are explicit, not implicit. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The skill is under 50 lines, single-purpose, and organized into clear sections (When to Use, How to Use, Result Format, Constraints) with no external references needed, satisfying the simple-skill carve-out. Not anchor 2 because nothing is mis-organized or mis-split; no bundle files exist to verify, and none are required. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |