Content
72%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is exceptionally concise and well-structured for a simple skill, but its guidance stays at the level of naming where to look without specifying how to check, and it lacks a validation step to confirm completeness of a batch analysis.
Suggestions
Add concrete detection methods per surface, e.g. specific grep patterns, schema-diff commands, or example before/after signatures for each of the four integration surfaces.
Include a verification step such as a checklist the agent must complete for all four surfaces before concluding, turning the "do not stop" directive into an explicit checkpoint.
Give one concrete example of a breaking change (e.g. a removed CLI flag or a renamed config key) so the expected output is unambiguous.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is seven lean lines with no padding and no explanation of concepts Claude already knows; every line earns its place, matching the anchor for lean and efficient content. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | It enumerates four concrete surfaces to search (app-server APIs, CLI parameters, configuration loading, resuming sessions) but gives no executable method or specific check, fitting the anchor for some concrete guidance that is incomplete. | 3 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A rough sequence exists with a partial directive ("Do not stop after finding one issue"), but as a batch-analysis operation it lacks an explicit validation checkpoint that the analysis is complete, which the rubric caps at 3. | 3 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | This is a short single-purpose skill under 50 lines with no need for external references, and it is cleanly organized into a scoped bullet list plus a directive, so it qualifies for the simple-skill exception of a top score. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |