Content
82%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
High-quality reference content: token-efficient, concrete, and immediately usable, with correct guidance on choice IDs, nesting, and single-call composition. The main gaps are a partially implicit rather than explicitly sequenced workflow (schema lookup -> ID resolution -> filter composition) and a couple of spots where detail is deferred to external tool schemas without inline examples.
Suggestions
Add a short ordered workflow at the top (get table schema -> resolve field/choice IDs -> compose filter -> single tool call) so the sequence is explicit rather than distributed across sections.
Include one inline example of a date value object (beyond the isWithin range object) instead of only deferring to the tool schema for available modes.
Show a basic flat multi-condition AND example alongside the OR example so all common composition patterns have executable models.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean reference material — a dense operator table, a compact field-type category list, targeted rules, and two minimal JSON examples — with no padding and no explanation of concepts Claude already knows (no 'what Airtable is' or 'what a filter is' prose). Every token earns its place. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Guidance is mostly executable: a full operator-to-operand-to-category table, concrete choice-ID and field-ID formats, a copy-paste operatorOptions example, and two complete JSON filter objects. Minor gaps keep it below fully executable — the date value object's modes are deferred to 'the tool schema defines the available modes' and no basic flat-AND example is shown. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A usable sequence is present (look up table schema for field/choice IDs, compose conditions, prefer one composed call over multiple), but it is distributed across sections rather than presented as an ordered workflow, and checkpoints like verifying a field ID exists are only implied. Read-only querying means the destructive/batch validation cap does not apply. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files exist, and the single-file body is well organized into clearly headed sections (schema shape, categories, operators, field-type rules, composing, examples) with easy navigation and no nested references. At ~110 lines it exceeds the under-50-line simple-skill case, and some of the operator/field-type reference could arguably live in a separate file, which keeps it at good-structure rather than ideal. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |