Conciseness

Overall efficient — no explanations of concepts Claude already knows, and dense with non-obvious operational detail (streamed JSONL output, auto-pagination, idempotency_key capture). Not a 5 because guidance is repeated across sections ("prefer `download-status` before remote calls" appears in Workflow, Always Do This, and Outputs; "never run `start` again" appears at lines 19 and 73) and several host-specific sentences (Codex heartbeat/yield handling) run long enough to be distracting.

Actionability

Fully executable copy-paste-ready commands for every operation: all six resource `list` calls with `--limit`/`--format`/`head` caps, all six `retrieve` calls, and `download-status`/`download-results` invocations with concrete flags and a note to substitute placeholders with absolute paths. Not a 4 because the common cases (list, retrieve, resume) are each covered with complete, runnable commands plus expected output semantics.

Workflow Clarity

The sequence and decision rules are present (prefer `download-status` locally, retrieve before download to capture `idempotency_key`, probe resources until one succeeds, never re-run `start`), but the mode numbering is inconsistent: the Workflow section defines four modes (1=local progress, 2=list, 3=retrieve, 4=resume) while the Command Pattern and Always Do This sections use a different numbering (Mode 1=list, Mode 2=retrieve, Mode 3=download), leaving "Mode 1" and "Mode 2" ambiguous. Not a 4 because this labeling conflict is a real navigation gap, not a minor one; not a 2 because the underlying steps and checkpoints are otherwise clearly sequenced and the skill is read-only, so the destructive/batch validation cap does not apply.

Progressive Disclosure

The body is a well-organized overview with clearly signaled, one-level-deep references: "Read [references/resume.md] before recovering a dropped session..." and "Read [references/api.md] for per-resource `list` columns, `retrieve` fields..." — both files exist, contain the promised material, and reference only each other (no nested chains). Not a 4 because navigation is explicit about when each file is needed and the split (overview vs. per-resource detail vs. resume semantics) matches the anchor example exactly.

Specificity

Lists multiple concrete actions — "listing jobs, checking progress, resuming downloads, recovering results, or downloading an existing job ID" — which comprehensively covers the skill's stated scope of "job status and result recovery". Not a 4 because there is no noticeable coverage gap within that scope; each operation mode is named as a distinct action.

Completeness

Explicitly answers both questions: what ("Boltz job status and result recovery") and when ("Use when listing jobs, checking progress, resuming downloads, recovering results, or downloading an existing job ID"), plus an explicit negative boundary ("Not for starting new jobs"). Matches the score-5 anchor with concrete trigger phrases; not a 4 because the when-clause is already fully explicit, not merely adequate.

Trigger Term Quality

Good natural-keyword coverage: "listing jobs", "checking progress", "resuming downloads", "recovering results", "downloading", "job status", "job ID" — phrases a user would plausibly say. Not a 5 because it omits some natural variations/synonyms users might use (e.g., "check on my run", "fetch/get results", "finished yet"); not a 3 because the core trigger vocabulary is well covered beyond just domain naming.

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Clear niche (Boltz jobs) with distinct triggers, and the "Not for starting new jobs" exclusion explicitly separates it from a job-submission skill. Minimal conflict risk; not a 4 because the boundary is stated outright rather than only implied.