Content
100%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a well-architected orchestration layer: lean, actionable, with a clearly sequenced workflow and explicit verification checkpoints, and strong one-level-deep progressive disclosure into 8 reference files. The main defect is a single dangling reference to a non-existent examples file.
Suggestions
Remove or create the missing examples/box-content-api-prompts.md referenced on the last line of the References section — it currently points to a file that does not exist, breaking navigation.
Consider collapsing the three reference listings (routing table, Workflow step 5, and References glossary) so each file is named in only one primary place, keeping the others as brief pointers, to tighten the token budget slightly.
In the routing-table 'Minimal verification' column, a couple of entries ('Choose the smallest Box object/action pair first', 'Reproduce with the exact actor, object ID, and endpoint') are procedural rather than verifiable commands — make them concrete where possible to match the executable tone of the rest.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The ~100-line body is lean and operational — a routing table, terse numbered workflow, and one-line guardrails packed with non-obvious gotchas ('Run Box CLI commands strictly one at a time', 'avoid get_file_preview for files known to exceed 3 MB') that earn their tokens; it assumes Claude's competence and never explains what Box is. Not level 2 because there is no concept padding, and the references appear in three places only because each listing serves a distinct navigational role (pairing, category selection, glossary). | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Gives concrete, copy-paste-ready guidance — exact CLI commands ('box users:get me --json'), a runnable smoke-check code block invoking scripts/box_cli_smoke.py and box_rest.py, and guardrails with specific numeric thresholds; not level 2 because the examples are executable commands rather than pseudocode or abstract description. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The 8-step Workflow is clearly sequenced with explicit validation built in (step 6 prove the smallest end-to-end flow, step 7 add a runnable verification step) plus a dedicated Verification section with read-after-write feedback loops; the destructive/batch cap at 2 does not apply because validation is present even for bulk operations. Not level 2 because checkpoints and verification are explicit, not merely implied. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | SKILL.md is a well-signaled overview pointing to 8 one-level-deep reference files (verified present and organized), with the routing table, step 5, and a References glossary providing clear navigation; content is appropriately split between orchestration and detail. Not level 2 because signaling and structure far exceed the 'inline content that should be separate' anchor, though one referenced path — examples/box-content-api-prompts.md — does not exist on disk. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 12 / 12 Passed |