Content
71%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is an exemplarily lean router-style overview with a clear, well-sequenced workflow and a good debugging checkpoint, but it lacks any executable detail (no code, commands, or configuration examples) and its reference section is misleading: most linked files are missing from the bundle while the bundle's other files are only reachable through full-guide.md.
Suggestions
Fix the References section: either include the referenced files (web/, android/, ios/, concepts/, troubleshooting/) in the bundle or remove the dangling links, and surface the existing files (references/environment-variables.md, references/samples-validation.md, references/versioning-and-drift.md) directly from SKILL.md.
Add one concrete executable element — e.g. a minimal SDK init snippet, the embed script/config keys for a campaign entry ID, or the exact commands/API calls used to validate a setup — so the workflow steps can be acted on rather than only checked off.
Tighten step 4 ('Keep user context updates, native URL handling, and handoff payloads explicit') into a concrete instruction or example payload, and add a validate-then-retry loop to the debug step.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is ~25 lean lines: a one-sentence scope statement, a 5-step workflow, and a reference list. No padding, no explaining what WebViews or CSP are — it assumes Claude's competence and every token earns its place, matching the anchor-5 example. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Steps name concrete items ("campaign, entry ID, allowed origins", "SDK readiness, campaign configuration, bridge injection, CSP") but provide no executable guidance — no code, commands, config snippets, or concrete examples of how to confirm or check anything. This is 'some concrete guidance but incomplete; missing key details'; it cannot reach 4 ('concrete code or commands with minor gaps') and is clearly above 2 since specific artifacts to check are listed. | 3 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear 5-step sequence (identify client → route to platform skill → confirm config → implement explicitly → debug) with an explicit debugging checklist covering failure modes. It falls short of 5 because there is no validation feedback loop (check → fix → retry) and step 4 is vague ('Keep ... explicit'); it exceeds 3 because step 5 provides explicit checkpoints rather than none. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The SKILL.md structure itself is good (concise overview, workflow, clearly labeled one-level-deep references), but scored against the actual bundle: 5 of the 6 referenced paths (web/SKILL.md, android/SKILL.md, ios/SKILL.md, concepts/architecture-and-lifecycle.md, troubleshooting/common-drift-and-breaks.md) do not exist in the bundle, and the three files that do exist besides full-guide.md (environment-variables.md, samples-validation.md, versioning-and-drift.md) are not linked from SKILL.md at all. Navigation fails for most listed paths, which undercuts the 'good structure, references mostly clear, minor organization gaps' of a 4; it stays above 2/1 because the section layout and reference signaling are present and not deeply nested. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 15 / 20 Passed |