Content
93%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A tight, high-quality skill body: lean directive prose, concrete commands and exact paths, a clear five-step workflow with a validation checkpoint, and a properly structured single reference file. The only notable gap is the absence of an error-recovery feedback loop around the sanity-check step.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is ~65 lean, directive lines with no explanation of concepts Claude already knows; every line instructs (paths, flags, defaults, guardrails). Matches the "lean and efficient; every token earns its place" anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Gives exact file paths, package-runner inference rules, every mode flag (--ios, --android, --web, --dev-client, --tunnel, --export-web), and concrete verification commands ("./script/build_and_run.sh --help"), with the full executable script and TOML examples confirmed present in the one-level reference. This is copy-paste-ready guidance covering the common cases. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Five clearly sequenced steps including an explicit validation checkpoint ("run ./script/build_and_run.sh --help or a short non-server mode ... to sanity-check syntax"). Falls short of 5 because there is no error-recovery feedback loop (what to do if the sanity check or TOML parse fails), though the operation is not destructive/batch so the cap at 3 does not apply. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized sections (Workflow, References, Guardrails, Output Expectations) with a single clearly-signaled reference — references/expo-run-button-bootstrap.md — verified to exist, contain the complete script and environment.toml examples, and be one level deep with no nested .md references. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 19 / 20 Passed |