Content
72%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is highly actionable and well-structured with appropriate progressive disclosure to four real reference files. Its main weaknesses are redundancy between the Quick Start and detailed sections and the absence of an explicit post-change validation step in the destructive Modify workflow.
Suggestions
De-duplicate the Quick Start snippets against the detailed mode phases, or collapse the Quick Start sections into pointers to the relevant phases, to reduce token redundancy.
Add an explicit post-change verify/feedback step to Mode: Modify (e.g. re-read the dashboard and confirm cells/rows match the plan after the PATCH), mirroring Build's Phase B5.
Prune Critical Gotchas entries that merely restate inline warnings (e.g. #1, #9), or move the inline warnings to the Gotchas list to keep each rule in one place.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Content is dense and actionable without explaining basic concepts, but the Quick Start snippets duplicate code that reappears in the detailed mode phases and the Critical Gotchas restate inline warnings (e.g. combined content+layout PATCH, strip-\n), so it could be tightened; not 3 due to this redundancy, not 1 because it is not padded with concepts Claude already knows. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides executable Python with real method calls, params, and data structures across all four modes (e.g. ws.create_dashboard(CreateDashboardParams(...)), update_dashboard with content/layout actions), copy-paste ready; not the level below because the examples are complete rather than pseudocode. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Sequencing is strong (Build phases B1-B5, Modify operation order with an explicit "must follow this sequence") and Build includes validation (B1 investigate, B5 verify), but destructive Modify operations execute without an explicit post-change verify/feedback loop, which caps clarity at 2; not 1 because the sequences are explicit, not 3 because of the missing validation checkpoint on destructive edits. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is an operational overview that pushes exhaustive detail to four one-level-deep reference files (dashboard-reference.md, dashboard-templates.md, bookmark-pipeline.md, chart-types.md), all confirmed present and clearly signaled both inline and in See Also; not the level below because the split is clean and navigation is explicit rather than loosely organized. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |