Content
85%Weight 40%Scale 1-3Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is highly actionable with concrete tools, code, HTML snippets, and a well-sequenced workflow with explicit fallback handling. It is well-structured with one-level-deep references, with only minor room to tighten comparative rationale prose.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly lean and instruction-dense, but includes comparative rationale prose such as 'This is lighter than the earnings-review skill (4Q vs 8Q...)' and 'The goal is just enough history to frame the latest quarter's results' that could be tightened. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | It names specific MCP tools (discover_companies, search_documents, get_stock_prices), gives exact file paths, copy-paste HTML snippets, and a concrete citation format, matching the fully-executable level-3 anchor. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Steps 1-11 are clearly sequenced with explicit fallback logic ('If no document is found, proceed...', 'If that returns nothing, try...') and clear no-data handling, matching the level-3 anchor; no destructive/batch operations require additional validation loops. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body points to clearly-signaled one-level-deep references (../data-access.md, ../design-system.md) and is organized into well-numbered sections, matching the level-3 anchor; no nested reference chains exist. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |