Content
72%Weight 40%Scale 1-3Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, highly actionable instruction skill with concrete MCP calls and clear sequencing. It loses points on conciseness (soft tone padding) and workflow_clarity (no explicit verification checkpoint before the batch archive/mark-done actions).
Suggestions
Tighten the tone/philosophy prose (e.g., 'without that nagging feeling that they forgot something', 'End on a positive note') into terse behavioral directives so every token earns its place and conciseness reaches 3.
Add an explicit verification checkpoint before batch destructive actions, e.g. 'Before archiving, list the threads to be marked done and confirm with the user; only then call update_thread with mark_done: true', to satisfy the rubric's feedback-loop requirement and lift workflow_clarity to 3.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly efficient with concrete MCP calls and no concept-explanation fluff, but includes soft tone/philosophy padding ('without that nagging feeling that they forgot something', 'reduce anxiety, not create it', 'Don't guilt-trip', 'End on a positive note') that could be tightened, matching the level-2 'mostly efficient but could be tightened' anchor rather than the level-3 'every token earns its place' anchor. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides specific, parameterized executable MCP calls ('Superhuman_Mail.list_threads' with 'labels: ["INBOX"]', 'limit: 50', 'is_unread: true'; 'query_email_and_calendar'; 'create_or_update_draft'; 'update_thread' with 'mark_done: true'/'mark_starred: true') plus a concrete output template, matching the level-3 'fully executable; copy-paste ready' anchor. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The 5-step sequence is clearly numbered with explicit guardrails (the 'labels: ["INBOX"]' filter emphasized in Step 1 and the guidelines), but Step 4 performs batch/destructive-ish operations ('archive the low-priority unread threads' via mark_done) with no explicit verify-before-act checkpoint, so per the rubric's batch/destructive-ops rule workflow_clarity is capped at 2. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | A single-file skill with no bundle files, organized into clear headed sections (How it works -> 5 steps -> Important guidelines) and no obvious content that should be split out; the rubric's note allows 3 for skills with no need for external references when well-organized. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |