Content
86%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is concise, highly actionable, and well-structured for a simple single-purpose skill, with a verified script reference and clear input/output contract. The only minor gap is a lack of an explicit validation-retry loop, which is largely unnecessary for read-only search.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean, assumes Claude's intelligence, and avoids explaining what HMDB or JSON is; the serotonin example is repeated in both "Common HMDB patterns" and "Execution", a minor redundancy that keeps it below score 5. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | It provides a copy-paste-ready bash invocation plus two complete concrete JSON request patterns covering common metabolite and pathway cases, matching the score-5 anchor for fully executable, copy-paste-ready guidance. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The read-only single-action flow (build request, run script, report success/failure) is clear and includes error feedback via ok=false; it is not score 5 because there is no explicit validate-and-retry loop, though the destructive/batch cap does not apply since this is retrieval only. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | At under 50 lines with well-organized sections and a single real bundle reference (scripts/rest_request.py, verified to exist) that is explicitly signaled, it meets the score-5 anchor for a simple skill with clean one-level structure. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |