Content
86%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured instruction-only skill: the body stays a lean overview with a clear five-step workflow ending in validation, and detailed code/templates are appropriately pushed one level deep into real, well-signaled reference files. The main gaps are the absence of any inline executable snippet and the lack of an explicit error-recovery loop in the validation step.
Suggestions
Add one short inline code snippet (e.g., a minimal AppIntent with openAppWhenRun) to the workflow so the most common case is executable without opening the reference file.
Extend step 5 with a brief fix-and-retry loop: what to check if the intents target fails to compile or routing does not land on the expected screen.
Include one example of a shortcut title/phrase pair inline in step 4 to make the discoverability guidance concrete before deferring to example-patterns.md.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Terse, directive bullets ("Expose the smallest useful action and entity surface", "Keep intent types thin; business logic should stay in app services") with no re-explanation of iOS or framework basics and no padding — every line carries guidance Claude does not already have. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Guidance is concrete — specific API names ("openAppWhenRun", "AppShortcutsProvider", "AppEnum", "EntityQuery") and a build/verify step — but no executable code is inline; it is delegated to references/code-templates.md, so this sits between anchor 4 and 5 rather than fully copy-paste ready in the body. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The five steps are clearly sequenced and step 5 provides validation checkpoints ("Build the app and confirm the intents target compiles cleanly", "Verify the app opens or routes to the expected place"), but there is no explicit fix-and-retry feedback loop if validation fails, matching anchor 4 rather than 5. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is a lean overview; the four referenced files all exist, are one level deep with no nested chains, and each is introduced with its purpose ("Read these references as needed"), while 300+ lines of code templates are correctly split into references/code-templates.md. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |