Content
93%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is a lean, executable single-purpose REST skill with a copy-paste example and well-organized sections referencing its one bundle file, with only a minor gap in explicit error-handling/validation guidance.
Suggestions
Add an explicit checkpoint telling Claude to inspect the `ok` field and branch on `error.code`/`error.message` (e.g., narrow paging or retry) before producing the markdown summary.
Optionally show a one-line failure example so the error contract is concrete rather than only described.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and assumes Claude's competence: short operating rules, field lists, and one executable example with no padding or explanation of what MetaboLights/libraries are, so every token earns its place. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | It gives a copy-paste-ready bash invocation plus concrete JSON patterns for the common cases (study discovery with record_path/max_items and a targeted studies/<accession> record), and lists exact required/optional input fields, fully covering the common usage. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The single action (pipe a JSON object to scripts/rest_request.py) is unambiguous with preferred paths stated, but there is no explicit validation/error-recovery checkpoint telling Claude to check the `ok` field and react to `ok=false` before summarizing, a minor gap below the explicit-feedback-loop anchor at 5. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The under-50-line skill is organized into clear sections and correctly references its single one-level-deep bundle file (scripts/rest_request.py, which exists), with the References section explicitly stating no further runtime references are needed, satisfying the simple-skill well-organized-sections bar. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 19 / 20 Passed |