moody-s-peer-analysis

Produce a Peer Analysis HTML report for a target company and its credit peers using Moody's GenAI MCP tools. Use this skill whenever the user asks to compare a company against its peers, run a peer analysis, do a credit peer comparison, generate a peer group report, or analyze relative credit positioning. Trigger even if they just name a company and mention "peers", "peer comparison", "credit comparison", "peer group", or "relative value".

Quality

88%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

Securityby

Low

Low-risk findings worth noting

Quality

Content

77%Weight 40%Scale 1-3

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The content is exceptionally actionable with concrete element IDs, formulae, and copy-paste snippets, and the multi-step workflow is well sequenced. It is held back by redundancy around the fiscal-year and delivery rules, the absence of a validate→fix→retry loop for the artifact, and heavy inline detail that could be moved into reference files.

Suggestions

Consolidate the repeated 'most recent fiscal year / FY label synchrony' guidance (currently in Step 4, the STRICT block, the Amendment section, and Tips) into a single authoritative section to remove redundancy.

Add an explicit validate→fix→retry checkpoint after assembling the HTML (e.g., verify all required element IDs are populated and FY labels match between Section 4 and 5 before delivering) to satisfy the feedback-loop expectation for batch artifact generation.

Move the large reference HTML/SVG snippets and bar-width formulae into a bundled reference file and link to it from SKILL.md to reduce inline bulk and improve progressive disclosure.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Conciseness	The body is highly actionable but padded: the "use most recent fiscal year / FY label synchrony" rule is restated in Step 4, the STRICT FY LABEL SYNCHRONY block, the dedicated Amendment section, and the Tips, and the same delivery contract is repeated in the CRITICAL block, Step 5, Step 7, and Tips. Not a score-3 lean document; mostly efficient but could be tightened, matching the score-2 anchor.	2 / 3
Actionability	Provides fully executable guidance: exact element IDs to populate, bar-width and median-line formulae, SVG coordinate math, rating→numeric maps, and copy-paste-ready reference HTML snippets, matching the score-3 anchor for concrete copy-paste-ready examples.	3 / 3
Workflow Clarity	Steps 1–7 are clearly sequenced and the parallel-batch data gathering is well specified, but for a destructive/batch artifact-generation task there is no real validate→fix→retry feedback loop on the HTML itself; only an output-shape contract and an FY-synchrony check, so per the rubric's feedback-loop note workflow clarity is capped at 2.	2 / 3
Progressive Disclosure	One real bundled asset is referenced (assets/template.html, present) and shared skills are signaled as one-level references, but the bulk of the detailed markup/formulae lives inline in SKILL.md rather than being split out, and the ../shared/* references point outside the skill bundle, giving some structure but not the cleanly split, well-organized layout of a score-3.	2 / 3
	Total	9 / 12 Passed

Description

100%Weight 40%Scale 1-3

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description is strong: third-person voice, concrete capabilities, explicit "Use this skill whenever..." trigger guidance, and a broad set of natural trigger terms. It clearly answers what the skill does and when to invoke it with minimal fluff.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Specificity	Lists multiple concrete actions — "Produce a Peer Analysis HTML report", "compare a company against its peers", "run a peer analysis", "generate a peer group report", "analyze relative credit positioning" — matching the score-3 anchor that lists several specific concrete actions.	3 / 3
Completeness	Clearly answers both what ("Produce a Peer Analysis HTML report ... using Moody's GenAI MCP tools") and when ("Use this skill whenever the user asks ... Trigger even if they just name a company and mention ..."), satisfying the score-3 requirement for explicit what AND when.	3 / 3
Trigger Term Quality	Explicitly enumerates natural user phrasings ("peers", "peer comparison", "credit comparison", "peer group", "relative value") plus "run a peer analysis" and "generate a peer group report", giving good coverage of terms a user would actually say, matching the score-3 anchor.	3 / 3
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk	It occupies a clear niche (Moody's credit peer analysis HTML reports) with distinct, domain-specific triggers ("peer analysis", "credit peer comparison", "relative credit positioning") that are unlikely to fire for unrelated skills, matching the score-3 anchor.	3 / 3
	Total	12 / 12 Passed

Validation

87%

Warnings & errors only

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 14 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

Criteria	Description	Result
skill_md_line_count	SKILL.md is long (1213 lines); consider splitting into references/ and linking	Warning
relative_links	Relative link issues: 9 suspicious	Warning

	Total	14 / 16 Passed

Repository: openai/plugins
Path: plugins/moody-s/skills/moody-s-peer-analysis/SKILL.md
Commit: 11c74d6

Reviewed: 17 days ago

Table of Contents

Discovery Implementation Validation

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.