Content
82%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A strong, action-dense skill body with executable commands, non-destructive safeguards, and genuine domain judgment (assay-aware duplication interpretation, overrepresented-sequence classification). The main gaps are the absence of an explicit validation-failure feedback loop and mild command duplication between the runner and direct-tool sections.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and assumes competence — interpretation rules and input checklists are genuine domain knowledge, with no basic-concept padding — but there is minor redundancy between the four runner invocations in 'Local Execution' and the direct-tool commands in 'Kickoff Pattern' that could be trimmed. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Fully executable, copy-paste-ready commands with concrete flags ('--trim-mode cutadapt --adapter-r1 AGATCGGAAGAGC', '--sample-sheet', '-t 4') covering the common cases: QC-only, single paired sample, optional trimming, and explicit adapters. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear sequence (Preflight → Local Execution → Interpretation Rules → Output Review) with most checkpoints present ('performs pre-execution validation', 'verify R1/R2 file counts and read-name pairing', 'Do not overwrite input FASTQs'), but there is no explicit error-recovery loop describing what to do when pre-execution validation fails. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files exist and the body has clean, well-labeled sections with no nested or buried references; the minor gap is that the four runner command variants could be consolidated or moved to a reference file. The under-50-line exception for a 5 does not apply to this ~120-line body. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |