Content
87%Weight 40%Scale 1-3Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A concise, highly actionable skill body with clear sequencing and clean structure; its main weakness is the absence of an explicit validation feedback loop within the count-generation workflow.
Suggestions
Add an explicit validation checkpoint after FASTQ-to-count (e.g., check resource_readiness.md / resource_plan.json and re-run preflight if incomplete) to lift workflow_clarity to 3.
Make the preflight install-plan loop explicit: install missing requirements, then re-run preflight before kickoff.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and assumes Claude's domain competence — it never explains what scRNA-seq, Cell Ranger, or UMAPs are, and every section earns its place, matching the level-3 anchor. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides fully executable, copy-paste-ready bash commands with concrete flags and paths (ngs_preflight.py, run_nfcore_pipeline.py, run_scrnaseq_fastq_to_count.py) and lists the exact output artifacts each runner emits, matching the level-3 anchor. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The three ordered rows give a clear sequence and the preflight acts as a readiness gate, but there is no explicit validate→fix→retry feedback loop for the FASTQ-to-count execution, so the level-3 checkpoint anchor is not fully met. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized into focused sections with only a one-level-deep reference to the embedded scrna-seq-qc skill and no nested reference chains; with no bundle files present the content is appropriately kept inline. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |