Content
100%Weight 40%Scale 1-3Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a tight, well-structured instruction skill that maps named actions to specific conditions, lays out a clear sequenced workflow, and includes an explicit safety checkpoint before the risky send operation. It assumes Claude's competence throughout and needs no external references.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The ~40-line body is lean and well-organized with no over-explanation of concepts Claude already knows (no preamble on what email or reply-all is), so it earns the lean-and-efficient anchor rather than the mostly-efficient-but-could-be-tightened score 2. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | It names concrete actions with precise use-conditions ("Use `search_messages` or `list_messages` to find the right thread", "Use `create_reply_draft` for reply and reply-all drafts", "Use `reply_to_email` only when the user explicitly asked to send"); per the instruction-only scoring note, the absence of code is not penalized because the guidance is specific and actionable. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The six-step Workflow is clearly sequenced and includes an explicit validation checkpoint for the irreversible send action ("If the user says 'send' but the content still depends on unstated choices, stop and ask the narrowest necessary confirmation question"), satisfying the feedback-loop requirement that would otherwise cap this at 2. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The skill is under 50 lines with no external references needed and is organized into clear sections (Overview, Relevant Actions, Workflow, Safety, Output), which the rubric explicitly allows to score 3 with just well-organized sections; no bundle files exist to verify. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 12 / 12 Passed |