Content
72%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is a strong, highly actionable multi-step workflow with concrete tool calls, formulas, and an explicit HTML template and citation format. Its main gaps are mild verbosity in the KPI examples and the absence of an explicit validation checkpoint on the final report.
Suggestions
Add an explicit validation step before saving, e.g. confirm every financial cell has a Daloopa citation and that no financial-statement items leaked into the Operating KPIs table.
Tighten the business-model KPI list and Apple-specific example into a shorter reference or move them to a referenced file to reduce token weight.
Consider a brief checklist at the end of Section 9 confirming all required report sections are present before declaring the report saved.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly efficient with every section earning its place via actionable specifics, but stretches like the long business-model KPI list and Apple-specific guidance could be tightened and partially restate knowledge Claude already has. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | It gives concrete function names (discover_companies, get_stock_prices), exact fields, computation formulas, citation format, HTML structure, and WebSearch query templates, making the guidance directly executable. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The 9-step sequence is clearly ordered with useful conditional guidance (ask for ticker if missing, broaden search on empty), but there is no explicit validation checkpoint on the final HTML deliverable. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is well-organized into numbered sections and points to two clearly-signaled one-level-deep external references (../data-access.md, ../design-system.md) with section anchors, with no nested references. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |