Content
75%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, actionable reference for the SEQ API with clear response handling and edge-case guidance. Minor trimming of the Overview and an added subuser code example would round it out.
Suggestions
Tighten the Overview by merging the 'Key insight' line into the opening sentence to remove redundancy.
Add a short runnable example for the subuser scores endpoint to match the actionability of the primary endpoint.
Make the 202 retry guidance explicit (e.g., 'retry after N minutes') so the asynchronous-calibration workflow has a concrete checkpoint.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly efficient with well-organized sections and complete code, though the 'Key insight' line and parts of the Overview restate the correlation that the preceding sentence already implies. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides an executable Python example with real endpoint, headers, params, and 200/202 handling, plus parameter tables; the subuser endpoint lacks a runnable code example, leaving a minor gap. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear interpretive flow from eligibility check through API call to response handling (200/202/omitted), with the CANNOT section covering edge cases; not a destructive workflow, so explicit validation checkpoints are not strictly required. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Single self-contained SKILL.md with clear section headers and no nested references; the inline API-reference block is somewhat long but appropriately placed given no bundle files exist. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |