working-capital

Cash conversion cycle, earnings quality, and working capital deep-dive

Quality

75%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

Securityby

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./plugins/daloopa/skills/working-capital/SKILL.md

Quality

Content

77%Weight 40%Scale 1-3

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

This is a highly actionable, well-sequenced analysis skill with concrete formulas, data-pull guidance, and a full report template, but it is verbose and ships as a single monolithic SKILL.md with no progressive disclosure into bundle files. Tightening the explanatory prose and offloading the report template/profile tables into referenced files would improve it.

Suggestions

Move the large HTML report template (lines 234-292) and the profile-classification table into a referenced bundle file (e.g. references/report-template.html / references/profiles.md) and link to them from the body to improve progressive disclosure.

Trim explanatory prose of accounting concepts Claude already knows (e.g., what high accruals or rising DSO imply) and keep only the task-specific framing, to improve conciseness.

Keep the strong workflow sequencing and consider making the YTD-conversion and data-gap checks into explicit 'validate before proceeding' gates to reinforce the existing checkpoints.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Conciseness	The body is mostly task-specific prescriptive guidance, but at ~290 lines it is verbose and includes explanatory prose on concepts Claude already knows (e.g., 'Persistent high positive accruals = low earnings quality', the parenthetical red-flag implications), so it could be tightened without losing clarity; it is not a monolithic concept explainer (level 1) nor fully lean (level 3).	2 / 3
Actionability	It gives concrete executable guidance throughout — exact series keywords to search, explicit formulas (DSO = (AR/Revenue) x days-in-period), a specific output path (reports/{TICKER}_working_capital.html), an HTML template, and the Daloopa citation format — copy-paste ready and fully specific, matching the level-3 anchor.	3 / 3
Workflow Clarity	A clearly numbered 1-7 sequence runs from company lookup through report save, with explicit checkpoints (ask for a ticker before proceeding, YTD-to-quarterly conversion check, flag data gaps) and the red/green-flag checklist serving as an analytical verification step; this meets the clear-sequence-with-validation anchor rather than the implicit-checkpoint level 2.	3 / 3
Progressive Disclosure	The body is well-sectioned and signals external references (../data-access.md, ../design-system.md), but it is a 290-line monolithic document whose own detail — the profile table, red/green flags, and full HTML report template — is all inline with no bundle files (references/, scripts/, assets/ are absent), so it sits at 'some structure, content that should be separate is inline' rather than the split-into-bundle-files level 3 or the poorly-organized level 1.	2 / 3
	Total	10 / 12 Passed

Description

72%Weight 40%Scale 1-3

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description carves out a clear, distinctive financial-analysis niche with natural trigger terms, but it is terse and omits any explicit 'Use when...' invocation guidance, leaving the 'when' only implied. Adding a trigger clause would raise completeness without sacrificing conciseness.

Suggestions

Append an explicit trigger clause, e.g. 'Use when the user asks for a cash conversion cycle, earnings quality, or working capital analysis of a company.'

Replace the single vague verb 'deep-dive' with one or two concrete actions (e.g., 'Compute CCC, assess earnings quality, and produce a working capital report') to lift specificity.

Keep the third-person voice (it is already correct) and avoid padding the term list with jargon variants.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Specificity	The phrase 'Cash conversion cycle, earnings quality, and working capital deep-dive' names a concrete financial domain plus the single vague action 'deep-dive', but does not list multiple specific concrete actions, matching the 'names domain and some actions' anchor rather than the multi-action level above or the vague 'helps with' level below.	2 / 3
Completeness	The description clearly states what the skill does (the three domain topics) but has no 'Use when...' clause or equivalent explicit trigger for when to invoke it, so per the judging guideline completeness is capped at 2 rather than reaching the explicit-what-and-when level 3 or falling to the missing-what level 1.	2 / 3
Trigger Term Quality	'Cash conversion cycle', 'earnings quality', and 'working capital' are exactly the natural terms an analyst would say when requesting this analysis, giving good coverage of likely user phrasing.	3 / 3
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk	The working-capital / earnings-quality niche is specific and distinctive, making it unlikely to trigger for unrelated skills; it is well above the generic 'could overlap' level 2 and far from the conflicting level 1.	3 / 3
	Total	10 / 12 Passed

Validation

93%

Warnings & errors only

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

Criteria	Description	Result
referenced_paths_exist	Referenced path issues: 1 missing	Warning

	Total	15 / 16 Passed

Repository: openai/plugins
Path: plugins/daloopa/skills/working-capital/SKILL.md
Commit: 11c74d6

Reviewed: 17 days ago

Table of Contents

Discovery Implementation Validation

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.