Content
87%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is exemplary for token efficiency and actionability, with concrete executable commands and a clean command table. Its only gap is the absence of an explicit validation feedback loop for destructive writes, which limits workflow clarity.
Suggestions
Add an explicit validate->fix->retry loop for destructive operations (e.g. run --dry-run, review the diff, then execute and re-check with a readonly read).
Show a brief before/after verification step for writes (e.g. list the object before and after a mutation to confirm the change).
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and assumes Claude's competence: it gives only commands, flags, and safety rules with no padding or explanation of concepts Claude already knows. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | It provides fully executable commands (gog auth list, gog schema admin) with specific flags, plus a command table and explicit pointers to --help and schema JSON; guidance is copy-paste ready. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | A 'Safe start' sequence exists with dry-run/readonly/confirm checkpoints, but for destructive writes there is no explicit validate-then-fix feedback loop, capping workflow clarity at 2. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | A short, well-organized overview under 50 lines with clear sections and one-level-deep references (../gog/SKILL.md, --help, schema JSON); content is appropriately split rather than monolithic. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |