CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

gog-groups

Google Groups operations through gog.

65

Quality

78%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./.agents/skills/gog-groups/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

100%

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The content is a tight, well-structured overview: executable safe-start commands, a clean command table, explicit safety checkpoints for writes/deletes, and a clearly signaled one-level reference to the shared gog skill. It respects token budget while remaining fully actionable.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is lean and efficient with no padding or explanation of concepts Claude already knows; every line (safe-start commands, the two-row command table, the schema/help pointer) earns its place, matching the lean-and-efficient anchor-3.

3 / 3

Actionability

It provides fully executable, copy-paste-ready commands (e.g. `gog auth list --check --json --no-input`, `gog --readonly --account user@example.com groups --help`) plus a concrete command table and explicit guidance to consult `--help` and schema JSON rather than guess, matching the fully-executable anchor-3.

3 / 3

Workflow Clarity

For this simple read-mostly skill the safe-start sequence is clearly ordered and includes explicit validation/safety checkpoints (use `--readonly` for non-mutating tasks, `--dry-run` before writes, and "Confirm the exact account, object, and mutation before any write or delete"), satisfying the feedback-loop expectation for destructive/batch operations at anchor-3.

3 / 3

Progressive Disclosure

The skill is well under 50 lines with no bundle files of its own; it is organized into clear sections and makes a single clearly-signaled one-level-deep reference ("Read `../gog/SKILL.md` first"), so per the simple-skill scoring note progressive disclosure scores 3.

3 / 3

Total

12

/

12

Passed

Description

57%

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description is concise and distinct but underspecified: it names the domain and tool without listing concrete actions and entirely omits a "Use when..." trigger clause. Adding explicit actions and an invocation trigger would lift specificity and completeness.

Suggestions

Add concrete actions to the description, e.g. "List groups you belong to and their members through gog."

Append an explicit trigger clause such as "Use when the user asks about Google Groups memberships, group members, or group listings."

Include natural term variations ("groups", "members", "mailing lists") to improve trigger coverage.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

The phrase "Google Groups operations through gog" names the domain and tool but uses the generic word "operations" rather than listing concrete actions like list/members/create, so it sits at the anchor-2 level of naming domain and some actions rather than the multiple-specific-actions anchor-3.

2 / 3

Completeness

It states what the skill does ("Google Groups operations through gog") but provides no "Use when..." clause or equivalent trigger guidance for when Claude should invoke it, which per the guidelines caps completeness at 2 (has what, when missing/only implied).

2 / 3

Trigger Term Quality

"Google Groups" is a natural term a user might say, but coverage is thin: no common variations ("groups", "mailing lists", "members") appear, and "gog" is internal jargon, matching the some-relevant-keywords-but-missing-variations anchor-2 rather than the good-coverage anchor-3.

2 / 3

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

"Google Groups operations through gog" carves out a clear, narrow niche tied to a specific service and tool, making it unlikely to trigger for unrelated skills, matching the clear-niche anchor-3.

3 / 3

Total

9

/

12

Passed

Validation

93%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

referenced_paths_exist

Referenced path issues: 1 missing

Warning

Total

15

/

16

Passed

Repository
openclaw/gogcli
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.