Content
90%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is an exemplary lean, executable reference: concise safe-start commands, a compact command table, and clear deferral to per-command help and schema. The only gap is the absence of an explicit validate-retry loop for destructive writes.
Suggestions
Add a brief explicit feedback loop for writes/deletes (e.g., run --dry-run, inspect the proposed change, then execute and re-verify) to push workflow_clarity to 5.
Optionally surface 1-2 inline examples of a representative add/update invocation so common cases need no extra lookups.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and efficient: a short safe-start block, a compact command table, and a one-line pointer to per-command help, with no padding or explanation of concepts Claude already knows. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | It provides copy-paste-ready, executable commands (auth/schema/list invocations) and a concrete command table, plus explicit pointers to --help and schema JSON for the remaining cases. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The 'Safe start' section gives a clear sequenced preamble and lists validation/safety guardrails (--readonly, --dry-run, confirm before writes), but there is no explicit validate->fix->retry feedback loop for destructive writes, leaving a minor checkpoint gap. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Structure is clean with well-labeled sections and a single one-level reference to ../gog/SKILL.md plus per-command --help/schema lookups; no bundle files exist to verify further, and bulk detail is correctly deferred rather than inlined. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |