CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

gog

gog CLI: safe Google Workspace automation, JSON, auth, scoped reads/writes.

59

Quality

68%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Low

Low-risk findings worth noting

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./.agents/skills/gog/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

82%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body is a highly actionable, lean CLI reference with concrete commands, strong safety rules, and a well-sequenced reauth workflow with validation checkpoints. Minor room remains to split the detailed reauth flow into a reference file.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is dense and lean — it assumes Claude knows OAuth, keyrings, and tmux, and avoids padding — but the Browser-Driven Reauth section is detailed enough that a few tokens could be trimmed or moved to a reference.

4 / 5

Actionability

It provides copy-paste-ready bash commands with concrete flags, account selection, and --wrap-untrusted across reads, writes, auth, and discovery, covering the common cases fully.

5 / 5

Workflow Clarity

The reauth flow is a clear sequence with explicit validation (verify response_type, run 'gog auth list --check', confirm scope breadth) and feedback loops (expired listener, fix env before reauth); other sections are reference catalogs rather than workflows, so it sits just below 5.

4 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

Sections are well-organized (Fast Path, Safety Rules, Auth, Common Reads, Writes, Discovery) and the Discovery section clearly signals docs/ paths for deeper material; no bundle files exist, and some inline content (e.g. full reauth detail) could be split, keeping it at 4.

4 / 5

Total

17

/

20

Passed

Description

53%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description is terse and names a clear niche, but it lacks any 'Use when...' trigger guidance and misses the natural service-name keywords (Gmail, Drive, Docs, etc.) users would actually say. Specificity and completeness are capped by the absence of explicit trigger phrasing.

Suggestions

Add an explicit 'Use when...' trigger clause, e.g. 'Use when built-in Google connectors lack a feature, shell automation needs stable JSON, or you need to inspect local Google auth state.'

Include the natural service-name trigger terms users actually say — Gmail, Calendar, Drive, Docs, Sheets — instead of only the generic 'Google Workspace'.

Name a few more concrete actions (e.g. search mail, read/write Sheets, upload to Drive) to lift specificity beyond the generic 'scoped reads/writes'.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

It names the domain ('Google Workspace') and a couple of concrete-ish actions ('auth', 'scoped reads/writes', 'JSON'), but does not enumerate the actual services (Gmail, Calendar, Drive, Docs, Sheets) or specific operations, so coverage is not comprehensive.

3 / 5

Completeness

The 'what' is present ('safe Google Workspace automation, JSON, auth, scoped reads/writes') but there is no 'Use when...' clause or equivalent trigger guidance, which caps completeness at 3 per the rubric guidelines.

3 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

'Google Workspace' and 'auth' are natural terms, but the description omits the service names users actually say (Gmail, Calendar, Drive, Docs, Sheets) and leans on technical jargon ('scoped reads/writes', 'JSON').

3 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Naming the specific 'gog CLI' and the Google Workspace niche makes it mostly distinct with only minor overlap risk against other Google-related skills, though no explicit distinguishing trigger phrases are given.

4 / 5

Total

13

/

20

Passed

Validation

100%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository
openclaw/gogcli
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.