Content
73%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is a well-structured, highly actionable campaign playbook with strong validation feedback loops and clean progressive disclosure into real reference files. Its main weakness is verbosity from repeated philosophy and long qualifying sentences that could be tightened.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly substantive operational guidance rather than basic-concept padding, but the root-cause-vs-quick-fix philosophy repeats across several sections and many long qualifying sentences could be tightened, fitting 'mostly efficient but could be tightened'; not 2 because the bulk is genuine domain detail. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete commands and identifiers abound — 'git -C <checkout> rev-parse HEAD', 'codex exec --sandbox read-only --ephemeral', 'ps -p <pid-list>', named workflows like '$autoreview', and real reference paths — giving mostly executable guidance with only minor gaps from placeholder-style '<...>' forms. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The 'Turn findings into verified fixes' section is a 9-step sequence with explicit validation checkpoints (exact-SHA + clean-content guards, discard-on-failure, fresh $autoreview, verify merge SHA before incrementing the ledger) and feedback loops, matching the top anchor despite this being a high-risk batch/merge operation. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Detailed materials are split into four real, one-level-deep reference files (campaign-evidence.md, evidence-ledger.md, subsystem-lanes.md, live-proof-routing.md) signaled with markdown links, but some dense operational paragraphs remain inlined in SKILL.md, leaving minor organization gaps versus the top anchor. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |