Content
82%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
An exceptionally actionable body that captures real live-server gotchas with exact commands, helper names, and validation feedback loops, staying token-efficient by sticking to non-obvious project specifics. Its main weakness is structure: everything lives inline in one ~290-line SKILL.md with no reference files, and the end-to-end authoring workflow must be assembled by the reader from separate sections.
Suggestions
Split the stable deep-dive material — v3 SDK style (union constructors, requireStatus semantics, doMalformedRequest), the error-shape triage table, and the validation-moments doctrine — into one or more references/ files (e.g. references/v3-sdk.md, references/error-shapes.md), keeping SKILL.md as a style-selection and conventions overview with clearly signaled one-level-deep links.
Trim secondary narrative such as the E2E CI log-streaming paragraph and the repeated embedded-SDK rationale, which add length without changing what Claude would do.
Add a short ordered "Writing a new e2e test" sequence near the top (pick style from the table → write with the pattern template → run via the targeted go test command → triage the error shape → choose the assertion helper) so the distributed guidance reads as one workflow.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is dense with non-obvious, project-specific knowledge (the testify int64 trap, SDK union XFromY constructors, decimal normalization, the requireStatus/CollectT interaction) and assumes Claude's competence throughout. A few passages could be trimmed — the E2E CI log-streaming paragraph and repeated embedded-SDK rationale — so it fits the efficient-with-minor-trimmable-parts anchor rather than the lean-everywhere one. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Guidance is fully executable: exact commands ("make etoe", "TZ=UTC OPENMETER_ADDRESS=http://localhost:8888 go test -C e2e -count=1 -v -run '^Test<Name>$' ./"), real helper signatures with file/line cites, a complete concrete TestIngest example, and pattern templates naming the exact assertion helpers to call. The common cases (lifecycle, table-driven matrix, eventual consistency) are each covered by a specific example plus a pointer to a real reference test. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Validation feedback loops are explicit and strong: "Write the test, run it once, inspect the raw problem via the 'problem: %+v' failure message, then pick the helper", and "Before asserting 400-at-create, run the request. If you get 201, pivot to the draft-with-errors shape". The start-to-finish authoring sequence is distributed across sections rather than presented as one ordered flow, which keeps it at clear-sequence-with-minor-gaps rather than a full ordered workflow with checkpoints. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Section structure is clear (style-selection table, shared conventions, per-style guides, patterns, gotchas), but this is a ~290-line single file with no references/, scripts/, or assets/ bundle — all detail (error-shape triage table, SDK union marshaling rules, validation-moments doctrine) is inlined in SKILL.md. This matches the anchor for content that should be separate sitting inline, though the good headers keep it above the unstructured level. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |