Content
87%Weight 40%Scale 1-3Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is concise and highly actionable with a clear output contract, the only notable gap being a missing self-verification step for the constraint-heavy batch of citations.
Suggestions
Add a pre-output verification step, e.g. 'Before emitting CITATION_PLAN, confirm every cited key exists in source_pack or bibliography and that >=20 distinct keys are used when available.'
Optionally include a brief self-check for duplicate or filler citations to close the validation loop on the USAGE_RULES constraints.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean: brief input definitions, a concrete output template, and tight hard rules with no over-explanation of concepts Claude already knows, matching 'lean and efficient; every token earns its place'. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | An explicit output-contract template with placeholders and role enums plus specific hard rules (>=20 keys, only keys from source_pack/bibliography, assign to claims not filler) gives copy-paste-ready, executable guidance for an instruction-only skill. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The single-task structure and output format are unambiguous, but hard batch constraints (>=20 distinct keys, keys must exist in source_pack/bibliography) lack an explicit verification checkpoint before emitting the plan, fitting 'sequence present but checkpoints missing or implicit'. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | At under 50 lines with no need for external references, the well-organized Inputs / Output contract / Hard rules sections satisfy the simple-skill carve-out for progressive disclosure at level 3. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |