CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

grill-me

Interview the user relentlessly about a plan or design until reaching shared understanding, resolving each branch of the decision tree. Use when user wants to stress-test a plan, get grilled on their design, or mentions "grill me".

80

Quality

100%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

100%

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body is minimal, directive, and clear: it tells Claude exactly how to run the interrogation, how to handle codebase-answerable questions, and to supply recommended answers. It assumes Claude's competence and wastes no tokens.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

Four lean sentences with no padding and no explanation of concepts Claude already knows; every token earns its place.

3 / 3

Actionability

Gives concrete directive guidance — walk each branch resolving dependencies one-by-one, provide a recommended answer per question, and explore the codebase instead of asking when possible — which is actionable for an instruction-only skill.

3 / 3

Workflow Clarity

The single conversational task is unambiguous with a clear strategy (interview → resolve each branch → reach shared understanding) and an explicit codebase-escape rule; no destructive or batch operation requires a validation checkpoint.

3 / 3

Progressive Disclosure

A sub-50-line single-purpose skill with no external references needed; the short body is appropriately self-contained and needs no separate file structure.

3 / 3

Total

12

/

12

Passed

Description

100%

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

A tight, well-constructed description that uses third-person voice, names concrete actions, and pairs a clear purpose with explicit natural-language triggers. It avoids fluff and over-claims while covering what, when, and how it differs from adjacent skills.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Names concrete actions in its domain — "Interview the user relentlessly... resolving each branch of the decision tree" — rather than vague language, matching the multiple-specific-actions anchor.

3 / 3

Completeness

Explicitly states both what it does (interview relentlessly until shared understanding) and when to use it via a clear "Use when..." clause.

3 / 3

Trigger Term Quality

Includes natural phrases a user would say — "stress-test a plan", "get grilled on their design", and the literal invocation "grill me" — giving good coverage.

3 / 3

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Occupies a clear niche (adversarial plan/design interrogation) with distinct triggers unlikely to fire for unrelated skills.

3 / 3

Total

12

/

12

Passed

Validation

100%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository
openstatusHQ/data-table-filters
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.