Content
92%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a tightly structured senior-advisor workflow with concrete commands, explicit validation/vet checkpoints, and clean one-level-deep reference navigation. Its only weakness is mild verbosity in a few justificatory passages.
Suggestions
Tighten the 'economics of this skill' paragraph and a few expanded justifications in Hard Rules — the core constraint is already clear from the rules themselves.
Consider collapsing the effort-level table prose around it so the table carries the comparison with less framing text.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Dense and information-rich with little explanation of concepts Claude already knows, but a few elaborative passages (e.g. the economics paragraph, some expanded justifications) could be trimmed. Not a 5 because it is not maximally lean. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides copy-paste-ready commands (git rev-parse, git merge-base diff, gh repo view --json visibility, gh issue create, tsc --noEmit, npm/pnpm audit), exact plans/ directory structure, and concrete per-plan requirements (ordered steps, verification commands, done criteria). | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear four-phase sequence (Recon → Audit → Vet/prioritize/confirm → Write plans) with explicit validation checkpoints — the Vet phase requires opening cited code to confirm findings, drift detection via commit stamp, and the execute variant has a verdict/re-review feedback loop. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | SKILL.md is a well-organized overview pointing to three real, one-level-deep references (audit-playbook.md, plan-template.md, closing-the-loop.md) via clearly signaled markdown links with explicit 'read it now/before' cues; content is appropriately split. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 19 / 20 Passed |