Content
75%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-built router skill: it refuses to scaffold, delegates to per-path skills, and gates handoff on explicit prerequisite checks. Its main weaknesses are a triple-repeated API-key explanation and a step-ordering inconsistency (prerequisites check placed after dispatch despite being labeled 'before handoff').
Suggestions
State the OCI_GENAI_API_KEY details (sk-... bearer token, GenAI console, no ~/.oci/config needed, default endpoint) once in Step 3 and reference it from the Stop conditions instead of repeating them three times.
Move the prerequisites check to Step 2 (before the dispatch step) or renumber so the labeled 'before handoff' check no longer follows the handoff step.
Add one line of recovery guidance for failed prerequisite checks (e.g., where to install Docker or point users to OCI docs when a check fails), mirroring the existing stop-condition pattern.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly efficient — a lean router with an exact print block — but the OCI_GENAI_API_KEY explanation (sk-... bearer token, GenAI service console, no SigV1/~/.oci/config) is repeated nearly verbatim in Step 3 items 3-4 and again in the Stop conditions, which could be consolidated into one pass. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Fully executable for an instruction-only skill: a copy-paste-ready question block, a dispatch table mapping specific answers ('1 / "beginner" / "easy"') to exact paths, concrete verification commands ('docker --version', 'python --version'), and exact response text for stop conditions. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Steps and validation checkpoints (docker, python, API key) are explicit, but Step 3 is titled 'One-time prerequisites check (before handoff)' yet is numbered after Step 2 'Dispatch', creating a sequencing inconsistency, and there is no recovery guidance if a prerequisite check fails. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | References (build-paths/README.md, build-paths/skills/README.md, PLAN.md) are one level deep, each with a stated purpose, and PLAN.md is conditionally loaded — good discipline. However, no bundle files are present to verify these paths exist, and the ~25-line tier descriptions in the print block overlap content that the referenced README presumably already covers. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |