Content
85%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a well-structured, token-efficient audit skill with a clear process and validation step. Its main weakness is actionability: the per-check guidance is descriptive rather than backed by concrete commands or snippets.
Suggestions
Add one or two concrete commands or grep/glob patterns per audit check (e.g. searching for `focusable`/`requestFocus`/`android:focusable`) so findings are produced with executable evidence rather than judgment.
Provide a short example of the expected Markdown output table so the report format is unambiguous and copy-paste ready.
Clarify the validation feedback loop by stating the action when compilation fails (fix and re-run) rather than only recommending the command.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and efficient, assuming Claude's competence with no padding or explanations of basic concepts; every section earns its place. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | The audit checks are concrete lists and the validation command (./gradlew :app:tv:compileDebugKotlin) is executable, but most checks describe what to verify rather than giving executable commands or code to perform each check. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear six-step numbered Process is sequenced with an explicit Validation checkpoint; the operation is a read-only audit so a validate-and-state-remaining-risk step suffices rather than a fix-retry loop. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | A single well-organized file with clear sections and no need for external references; the guideline permits a top score for compact, well-structured skills without bundle files. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |